Beauty and The Beast
Photo of the Day for February 11, 2009But what a cute little beast he is, no?
I love this shot … and I’m also fascinated by it, because, unless I’m mistaken, the lovely Ms. Jayna took it. Now, if seeing a great shot like this and realizing a 3-year-old took it isn’t enough reason to go buy yourself a digital SLR camera, I don’t know what is.
And speaking of photographic geekery: Jon Armstrong posted at his website last night a tutorial on using Adobe Lightroom to convert a color photo to grayscale. This reminded me of a lesson I once learned at a Photoshop seminar, during which the instructor showed his recommended method for using PS to convert a color photo to grayscale. He suggested that simply selecting “Grayscale” in the “Image” menu produced sub-par results, and that the results of his method were more similar to actual black-and-white film output. I was going to post the instructions for that method in the comments section of Mr. Armstrong’s tutorial, but he helpfully reminded me that I have my own website, so I am instead posting the information below—which actually works out a lot better, because I included here a bunch of menu screen-captures that I would not have included in the comments over at blurbomat.
So, let’s compare.
Using the color image above as a starting point, let’s convert it to black & white the lazy way:

After doing that, what you end up with is this:

Nice enough. However, the method I was taught goes like this:
I will again start with the color image above, and then go to “Image -> Calculations”:

The following dialog box will open up, and the settings I’ve selected are those I was taught were preferable for the conversion method we’re discussing:

As you can see, I’ve opted to have the output be sent to a new document, thus leaving the original unscathed. The resulting new document looks like so:

I then applied a “Levels” adjustment layer …

and tweaked the sliders a bit …

which left me with what I am satisfied to have as a final result:

For the sake of comparison, I applied the same exact “Levels” settings to the “Grayscale” image created way back at the beginning of this whole thing, and this is what I ended up with:

Obviously, you could tweak the “Levels” sliders to end up with a more palatable version of the “Grayscale” image, but the point is that the image generated by the “Calculations” operation has a broader range of midtones to mess with.
Here’s a side-by-side look, with the “Grayscale” version on the left and the “Calculations” version on the right:

My only real complaint is the loss of detail in the eyes … but those could obviously be isolated and tweaked. That notwithstanding, I do have to say that the “Calculations” version does, in fact, have more of the same depth and warmth you would find in an actual black-and-white print than does the “Grayscale” version. So, I’m convinced. You?

